Why “Made in China 2025” Will Dominate Global Trade

By Moatasim Al Khatib

Introduction

China’s economic diplomacy is fundamentally altering global trade dynamics through targeted policies such as “Made in China 2025.” This initiative represents a cornerstone of Beijing’s industrial strategy, designed to transition the nation from being the world’s factory for low-cost goods to a global leader in high-value industries. By focusing on sectors like artificial intelligence (AI), semiconductors, and robotics, China is positioning itself at the forefront of technological innovation while reshaping global trade rules. This policy-driven approach provides valuable lessons for nations seeking to modernize their industrial frameworks and assert their roles in a competitive global economy.

Key Policies and Impacts

One of the most impactful components of China’s economic diplomacy is the “Made in China 2025” initiative. This policy prioritizes advancing ten critical industries, including next-generation information technology, robotics, aerospace, and new energy vehicles. Central to its implementation is substantial government funding, amounting to hundreds of billions of dollars allocated to research and development (R&D). These funds support both state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and private firms in driving innovation and technological advancement. A pivotal example within this framework is China’s semiconductor policy. The government has recognized semiconductors as a critical sector for economic and technological independence, particularly in the face of geopolitical tensions and trade restrictions. To address this, Beijing established the National Integrated Circuit Industry Investment Fund, also known as the "Big Fund." This fund has mobilized over $50 billion to develop domestic capabilities in chip manufacturing, design, and innovation. As a result, China has made significant strides in reducing its reliance on foreign semiconductor imports, positioning itself as a key player in the global chip supply chain.

The role of innovation hubs further amplifies the impact of “Made in China 2025.” Cities like Shenzhen and Zhongguancun, often referred to as "China’s Silicon Valley," exemplify the success of integrating research, manufacturing, and commercialization. Tax incentives, grants, and favorable regulations within these hubs have fostered ecosystems where startups and established firms thrive. For instance, Huawei and BYD, headquartered in Shenzhen, have emerged as global leaders in telecommunications and electric vehicles, underscoring the effectiveness of China’s industrial clusters.

Stakeholder Perspectives

For governments, China’s policies illustrate the potential of leveraging industrial strategies to drive modernization. The focused investment in semiconductors demonstrates how strategic planning can enhance self-sufficiency in critical technologies, a lesson increasingly relevant for nations facing supply chain vulnerabilities. Policymakers worldwide can adopt similar frameworks to identify and prioritize industries crucial to their national security and economic resilience. From the private sector’s perspective, policies like “Made in China 2025” provide fertile ground for collaboration and growth. Domestic firms benefit from generous state support, while foreign companies have opportunities to partner with Chinese entities on cutting-edge projects. However, navigating the regulatory landscape and competing with state-backed competitors can pose challenges for international businesses.

For global institutions, policies like China’s semiconductor initiatives raise questions about market distortions. Subsidies and protections for domestic firms challenge the principles of fair competition, necessitating discussions on how to balance national priorities with global trade norms. These tensions highlight the need for international frameworks that accommodate innovation while ensuring equity.

Comparative Insights

China’s semiconductor strategy under “Made in China 2025” highlights a stark contrast with the laissez-faire approach of the United States. While the U.S. relies on private-sector leadership in innovation, China’s state-driven model mobilizes centralized resources to achieve strategic objectives. Europe, meanwhile, has implemented initiatives like the European Chips Act to boost semiconductor capabilities but lags behind China in terms of funding and speed of execution. For developing nations, China’s approach offers a roadmap for bridging technological gaps. Countries in Southeast Asia and Africa, for example, could replicate aspects of China’s industrial policy by creating sector-specific funds and fostering innovation hubs to address local challenges. This targeted approach provides a feasible alternative to traditional reliance on foreign investment and technology transfers.

Challenges and Critiques

Despite its successes, “Made in China 2025” faces significant challenges and criticisms. Geopolitically, China’s semiconductor policy has been met with pushback, particularly from the United States. Export controls and sanctions targeting Chinese firms, such as Huawei, have exposed vulnerabilities in China’s supply chain, especially in high-end chip manufacturing. These restrictions underscore the difficulty of achieving complete self-sufficiency in a highly globalized industry. Domestically, the heavy reliance on subsidies has raised concerns about inefficiencies and resource misallocation. Some state-owned enterprises have struggled to innovate despite substantial funding, leading to calls for better accountability and performance benchmarks. Moreover, the perception that foreign firms face disadvantages in the Chinese market has strained international trade relationships. Environmental concerns also pose challenges. The semiconductor industry is energy-intensive, and while China has made strides in renewable energy, the carbon footprint of its industrial growth remains a critical issue. Balancing rapid industrialization with sustainability goals will be essential for long-term success.

People visit the Huawei booth during the Mobile World Congress (MWC) 2024 in Barcelona, Spain, February 26, 2024. Photo: Xinhua

Policy Recommendations

To emulate China’s achievements, policymakers worldwide should consider adopting sector-specific strategies that align national priorities with global trends. Establishing funds similar to the National Integrated Circuit Industry Investment Fund can accelerate development in critical areas such as AI, renewable energy, or advanced manufacturing. Governments should also foster innovation ecosystems by integrating academia, industry, and public institutions, creating environments conducive to R&D and commercialization. Transparency and international cooperation are equally important. Policymakers must ensure that subsidies and protections are accompanied by clear objectives and measurable outcomes to maintain credibility in global markets. Furthermore, collaborating with international institutions to set industry standards can mitigate tensions and promote fair competition. Finally, sustainability must be a core component of industrial strategies. Investing in energy-efficient technologies and green manufacturing processes can address environmental concerns while enhancing global competitiveness.

Call to Action

Governments, businesses, and global institutions must engage with China’s policies like “Made in China 2025” to draw lessons and address challenges. Policymakers should adapt elements of China’s strategic approach to foster innovation and resilience, while ensuring transparency and fairness. Collaboration between nations on shared priorities, such as semiconductor development and sustainability, can build a more balanced and inclusive global trade system.

---

About the Author

Moatasim Al Khatib ( 王伟): UAE-born Master's student at Tsinghua University’s School of Public Policy and Management, where he is a scholarship recipient. Before moving to Beijing, he worked in private sector consulting for the public sector and later served as a Data and Economics Specialist for the UAE government. He has also worked with non-profit organizations in the Middle East and Scandinavia. He has a keen interest in China and is the co-founder of the Global Sino Institute, a think tank initiative focused on fostering global dialogue on China’s economic and policy landscape. His research interests include public policy, institutions, and macroeconomics, and he aspires to pursue a PhD in National Economics.

---

Page Editor: Jin Yulin

---

Call for Contributors!

I’ve added an “ Op-Ed” section to China Up Close. It’s an open platform I specifically designed to let everyone share their own perspectives with the world. Articles can be related to any topic as long as you’re highly passionate about it! Article length is recommended to be within 700 - 900 words.

If you have an idea for an Op-Ed, contact jjnewsletter@hotmail.com with a brief description of the article's focus.

---

---

Jingjing’s Social Media Links

X: @Jingjing_Li YouTube: @Jingjing_Li Facebook: Talk it Out with Li Jingjing

TikTok: @iamlijingjing Reddit: r/NewsWithJingjing Instagram: @jj_ontheroad